Ross v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Appellant Eric Alan Ross was convicted of a misdemeanor violation of Indiana’s handgun statute. 1 Because Ross had an earlier felony conviction, the present conviction was enhanced to a class C felony. 2 The court also found that Ross was an habitual offender and added a penalty under the general habitual offender statute. 3
Ross asserts it was improper to sentence him under two different sentence enhancement schemes. We agree.
I. Statement of Facts
On, April 12, 1997, armed with a .22 caliber pistol, Ross attacked his ex-girlfriend in an Evansville parking lot. The State…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Freeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Haymaker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Stanek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Conrad v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Anthony H. Dye v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.