Freeman v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Appellant Todd E. Freeman was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. His offense normally would have been a class A misdemeanor, but the trial court enhanced it to a class D felony based on his prior similar convictions. The court enhanced his sentence a second time after adjudging him a habitual substance offender. He claims this was error. We agree.
I. Statement of Facts
In December 1989 the police arrested Freeman for driving his automobile while intoxicated. The State charged Freeman in a single count, with three contentions. First, the State alleged that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Park 100 Development Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Superior Construction Co. v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Schrenker v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Merritt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Neal v. Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of M.N.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Haymaker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- AlliedSignal, Inc. v. OttIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.