Legal Opinion

Lubbering v. Kohlbrecher

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1856PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Jlppeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner’s Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRyland, Judge

The plaintiff brought suit before a justice of the peace on a promissory note for $100. The defence was that it had been fraudulently altered after its execution, and without the consent of the makers. The plaintiff had judgment before the justice of the peace ; the case was then taken by appeal to the law commissioner’s court.

When the trial came off in the law commissioner’s court, the defendant objected to the reading o£ the note in evidence, because it bore marks or evidence on its face of having been altered and erased after its execution; that the plaintiff must first explain the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SpaldingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1822

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ThueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Paramore v. LindseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Murphy v. HolliwayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Sweitzer v. Allen Banking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API