Legal Opinion

State v. Fults

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2006No. 04CR1586, 04CR1689 A127874 (Control), A127875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

This is a criminal case in which defendant appeals judgments in two cases that have been consolidated for purposes of appeal. The sole issue on appeal pertains to the lawfulness of one of the sentences in one of the cases. We agree with defendant that that sentence is unlawful and therefore vacate the sentences in that case, ORS 138.222(5), and remand for resentencing.

In Case Number A127874, defendant was convicted of manufacture of a controlled substance (MCS), reckless driving, and driving under the influence of intoxicants. In Case Number A127875, defendant was convicted of felon in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. DowdCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. FultsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API