Legal Opinion
Gordon v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 1990No. 88-369 and 89-925PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant appeals from her conviction by a jury of distribution of phencyclidine (PCP) and marijuana under D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (Supp.1990), and the denial of her motion under D.C.Code § 23-110 (1989), on the grounds that the trial court failed to conduct a proper Monroe-Farrell inquiry and improperly denied a mistrial and that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Finding these contentions unpersuasive, we affirm.
I
In contending that the trial judge failed to conduct a proper Monroe-Farrell inquiry in response to pretrial complaints about appointed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Farrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wingate v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- McKenzie v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.