Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 1995No. 93-CF-1340 & 94-CO-1250PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant McKenzie was convicted of armed robbery and related offenses at a bench trial at which a coparticipant in the charged events, Ronald C. Jenkins, was a principal government witness. 1 On appeal, McKenzie argues: 1) the trial court made an inadequate inquiry into his pretrial complaint about his appointed counsel, and 2) in its determination of Jenkins’s credibility, the trial court improperly took into account a statement made by Jenkins at the time of his arrest, which was referred to at trial but not introduced into evidence in full text. We affirm.
I
On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Farrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Porter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- McClellan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Daye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Dancy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Wingate v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.