Legal Opinion
Wingate v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1995No. 91-CF-123, 94-CO-241PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, D.C.Code § 22-502, and related offenses1 stemming from a fracas involving appellant’s estranged wife and her friend, William Morton. Appellant filed a posh-trial motion under D.C.Code § 23-110 collaterally attacking his conviction. He asserted that the trial court conducted an inadequate Monroe-Farrell2 inquiry into his pretrial complaints *1277about counsel. He further asserted that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Anthony Wayne Fagan, United States of America v. Anthony Wayne FaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Norman C. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Forte v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Yancey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Heyliger v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.