Fairfield County Board of Commissioners v. Nally
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
I. Introduction
{¶ 1} This environmental case challenges the procedure used by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (“Ohio EPA”) in issuing a renewed water-discharge permit to the Tussing Road Water Reclamation Facility in Fairfield County (the “Tussing Road plant”). The wastewater-treatment plant, because it discharges certain substances into Blacklick Creek, is required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit from Ohio EPA under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (“the Clean Water Act”). See 33 U.S.C. 1342(a); R.C. 6111.03.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Condee v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Adams v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Freeman v. Ohio Elections Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Starr v. Ohio Dept. Commerce, Div. of Real Estate & Professional LicensingOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Drillers Place Ltd. v. Mormack Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- O'Neal v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.