Legal Opinion

Fairfield County Board of Commissioners v. Nally

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2015No. 2013-1085PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} This environmental case challenges the procedure used by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (“Ohio EPA”) in issuing a renewed water-discharge permit to the Tussing Road Water Reclamation Facility in Fairfield County (the “Tussing Road plant”). The wastewater-treatment plant, because it discharges certain substances into Blacklick Creek, is required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit from Ohio EPA under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (“the Clean Water Act”). See 33 U.S.C. 1342(a); R.C. 6111.03.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. Condee v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adams v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Freeman v. Ohio Elections Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Starr v. Ohio Dept. Commerce, Div. of Real Estate & Professional LicensingOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Drillers Place Ltd. v. Mormack Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. O'Neal v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API