Legal Opinion
Bixler v. Board of Supervisors
California Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1881No. 7,567PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento. McFarland, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Morrison, C. J.:
David Bixler presented his petition in the Superior Court of Sacramento County, praying for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the above Board in vacating an order directing a supplemental assessment to be made in Reclamation District Number Three. The petition set out, that “ on the ninth day of June, 1880, the Trustees of Reclamation District Number Three presented to and filed with the Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County a statement showing that the original assessment and all the further assessments levied on the lands of said district were insufficient to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hagar v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People ex rel. McDonald v. BushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- People v. SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- People v. WirchanskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Gilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Levee Dist. No. 9 v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Spurrier v. NeumillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918