Legal Opinion
Bidart Brothers, a California Corporation v. The California Apple Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-15084PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
The California Apple Commission (“the Commission”), created by a majority vote of California Apple producers, pursuant to California Food & Agriculture Code §§ 75501 et seq., assesses a fee of one-fourth cent per pound of apples marketed on all producers of more than 40,000 pounds of California apples per year. The assessments are used predominantly to promote .the sale of California apples. Bidart Brothers (“Bidart”), a major producer of California apples, brought suit in the Eastern District of California seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on the grounds that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- New Jersey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Collins Holding Corporation v. Jasper County, South Carolina, a Political Subdivision of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. Balmoral Racing Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Hager v. City of West PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Lynn v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.