Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of Hudson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

There is no valid objection to the erection of a fence to the height appellant intends to build it. The trial court so ruled, and that ruling is not questioned by any appeal or notice to review.

• Appellant proposes to attach to the top of the fence, on the inside, arms, and to string barbed wire thereon. Is the ordinance prohibiting the use of barbed wire as a part of any fence in the city of Hudson, except on farms, valid and effective against this appellant? She owns a home in the city of Hudson with about an acre and a quarter in connection with it. She grows vegetables; has bearing fruit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Piper v. EkernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Barr v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. City of Mason City v. Morgan BarngroverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Town of Fond Du Lac v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of Norris v. BradfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hall v. MertzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Business Brokers Asso. v. McCauleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API