Stevens v. City of Salisbury
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*560Prescott, C. J.,
delivered the majority opinion of the Court. Barnes, J., concurs in the result. Concurring opinion at page 573, infra.
Interesting and important principles of law are involved in this appeal, some of which are fundamental and novel in nature. The case has been ably briefed and argued by counsel on both sides.
Appellants, the owners of three corner properties (the Stevenses, the Hostetters, and Miss Hopkins), located within the boundaries of the City of Salisbury, challenge the validity of § 42 of the Zoning Regulations of that city, which reads as follows:
“The City of Salisbury,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Bureau of Mines v. George's Creek Coal and Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Montgomery Citizens League v. GreenhalghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.