Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 17, 2014No. 120747890; A152843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a burglary tool — a crime that he was charged with having committed by possessing a burglary tool or theft device “with intent to use it to commit and facilitate a theft by physical taking” in violation of ORS 164.235(1). The tool consisted of multiple spark plugs that had been attached to a handle and “intertwined” in a way that made them suited to breaking car windows. We address a single issue on appeal: whether evidence that defendant possessed that tool, which he believed was illegal to possess, is sufficient to support a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. David Decker v. Rob PerssonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API