State v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a burglary tool — a crime that he was charged with having committed by possessing a burglary tool or theft device “with intent to use it to commit and facilitate a theft by physical taking” in violation of ORS 164.235(1). The tool consisted of multiple spark plugs that had been attached to a handle and “intertwined” in a way that made them suited to breaking car windows. We address a single issue on appeal: whether evidence that defendant possessed that tool, which he believed was illegal to possess, is sufficient to support a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- David Decker v. Rob PerssonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020