Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Nielsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1981No. 17082PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the property loss sustained as the result of a collision between automobiles operated by defendant and plaintiff’s minor, unemanci-pated daughter. Defendant joined the minor daughter as a third-party defendant, seeking contribution.

Third-party defendant moved for summary judgment of dismissal on the ground that she was not liable in contribution since she had no liability to her father as a joint tort-feasor by virtue of the doctrine of parent-child immunity. From the denial of her motion, and from the subsequent jury verdict which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Kaczorowski v. KalkosinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CallUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Frye v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Ellis v. Estate of EllisUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Kimberly Landis and Alva Nelson v. Hearthmark, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API