Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1996No. 93-0208; Crim.App. No. 29863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of larceny of military property, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 22 months, partial forfeitures, and reduction to E-4. The convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 6 months, partial forfeitures, and reduction to E^4. The Court of Military Review1 affirmed.

Appellant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  4. United States v. Miriam Henao Posado, Pablo Ramirez and Irma Clemencia HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Julio PiccinonnaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. ShavrnochCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API