Legal Opinion
Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Read
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided January 9, 2002No. 10-00-200-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BILL VANCE, Justice.
This is a condemnation case. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. (“Pinnacle”), the con-demnor, appeals that: (1) the condemnation proceeding it filed should not have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and (2) the jury charge and evidence on damages was improper. We will affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
Pinnacle, a gas utility regulated by statute,1 planned to construct two new natural gas pipelines across a 61.92 acre tract in Leon County belonging to Raymond Read and Mark Read (“Appellees”) and mortgaged to Thomas Fetzer, II. Pinnacle sought to condemn a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Teletron Energy Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Drichas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- David Drichas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Raymond Michael Read, Mark William Read, Owners, and Thomas I. Fetzer, II, Lienholder, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Raymond Michael Read, Mark William Read, Owners, and Thomas I. Fetzer, II, Lienholder, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.