Legal Opinion

Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Read

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2003No. 02-0169PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

We deny Raymond Michael Read and Mark William Read’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of March 6, 2003, and substitute the following in its place.

In this condemnation case, Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. sought to obtain a permanent utility easement and a temporary construction easement on property owned by Raymond and Mark Read and mortgaged to Thomas Fetzer II (collectively “the Reads”). Pinnacle obtained a writ of possession for the easements and constructed a pipeline. About two years later, the trial court granted the Reads’ motion to dismiss the condemnation proceeding,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. VE CORP. v. Ernst & YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. Read, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  3. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. ReadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Zipp v. WuemlingTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Mike Rawlings, Mayor v. Timoteo F. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  4. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Denisco, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API