Legal Opinion

State v. DeGrat

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1996No. 21666PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a criminal case. The issues presented concern (1) the constitutionality of I.R.E. 606(b) in precluding juror testimony concerning discussion of the defendant’s failure to testify at trial, and (2) the sufficiency of evidence to support the convictions. We conclude that the application of I.R.E. 606(b) in this case was constitutional and that there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Robert Wayne DeGrat was tried and convicted of sexual abuse of a minor child and lewd conduct with a minor child. DeGrat did not testify…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. FilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BabbIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. ErwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BushIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. AllenIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
  4. State v. HickmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. TurnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API