State v. Byers
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*160BISTLINE, Justice.
Defendant-appellant Harvey Byers appeals from a jury conviction of rape. His principal contention on appeal is that there was insufficient corroboration of the prosecutrix’s testimony to support the conviction.
The prosecutrix, who was separated from her husband and living with her infant, testified that on June 30,1976, a man whom she had never seen before came by her apartment after 9:30 p. m. looking for another person. She gave him a glass of water, and he left. About 2:30 that night the prosecutrix heard a knock on her door. She attempted to turn on the porch light, but…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- STATE of Tennessee v. DeWayne COLLIER AKA Patrick CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. GristIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.