Legal Opinion

Reed v. EnviroTech Remediation Services, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 1, 2011No. Civil No. 09-1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Trust Funds (the “Funds”) brought this action seeking unpaid employee benefit contributions from EnviroTech Remediation Services, Inc. (“EnviroTech”).1 The Funds later added Lindstrom Cleaning & Construction, Inc. d/b/a Lindstrom Restoration and Lindstrom Environmental, Inc. (“Lindstrom”) as a defendant, claiming that Lindstrom is the alter ego or successor in interest to EnviroTech.

Lindstrom asserts that it is entitled to summary judgment because it did not sign a collective bargaining agreement with the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kevin Nutt v. Osceola Therapy & Living Cntr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. Nutt v. KeesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API