Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Gifford

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 21, 2007No. Civ. A. 2213-CCPublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHANDLER, Chancellor.

The issue presently before me in this case is whether this Court may properly exercise personal jurisdiction over certain nonresident defendants. In deciding this issue, I consider whether a statutory basis exists for the exercise of jurisdiction, whether plaintiffs have satisfied their burden to demonstrate a factual basis for this Court’s exercise of jurisdiction and, if so, whether such exercise is constitutional.

For the reasons set forth later in this Opinion, I conclude that this Court cannot exercise jurisdiction over Frederick G. Beck, Alan Hale, Richard C.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. GheewallaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Gantler v. StephensSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Amalgamated Bank v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  3. McPadden v. SidhuCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
  4. Hazout v. Tsang Mun TingSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. Ruggiero v. FUTURAGENE, PLC.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API