Legal Opinion

United States v. Windham

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 5, 1965No. 18,606PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Before a general court-martial in Stuttgart, Germany, the accused pleaded guilty to five specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. Only one of these specifications is in issue. It alleged, and a stipulation of facts shows, the accused stole sixty-four checks from the office of the commissary at Robinson Barracks. Each check, apparently drawn by a commissary patron, was to the order of the Treasurer of the United States. In sum, they totaled $1,292.34.

Appellate defense counsel contend that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jolly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. ZemartisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. HamillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. AutreyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. EppersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. PooleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. MervineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. WalkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API