Legal Opinion

Piasecki v. City of Hamtramck

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2002No. Docket 222890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s order denying defendants’ motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10). We reverse and remand.

This case arises from plaintiff’s discharge from her position as director of income tax for defendant city of Hamtramck. Former Hamtramck Mayor Robert Kozaren appointed plaintiff to the position. Plaintiff was appointed to the same position by Kozaren’s successor, defendant Gary Zych. As director of income tax, plaintiff reported directly to the mayor.

After learning that Kozaren pleaded guilty to charges in connection with his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Landico, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Hall v. St. Jude Med. S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
  3. Alvin Nabil Alosachi v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Debin Xia v. United Machining, Inc. and Wescast Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  5. Hall v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API