Legal Opinion

In Re Accutane Products Liability

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided June 15, 2007No. 8:04-md-2523-T-30TBM, MDL No. 1626PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Exclude General Causation and Labeling Testimony of Dr. Ronald Fogel (Dkt.#411) and Plaintiffs’ Response thereto (Dkt.# 444). Upon review of the pleadings, memoranda, and attachments, the Court concludes that the Motion should be granted.

Plaintiffs contend that Accutane (an acne medication) causes inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and psychiatric problems. Their complaints have been divided into separate groups or tracks according to the type of injury alleged. This Order deals only with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnny C. McClain v. Metabolife International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Black v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. State of Ohio v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Asarco Inc., Intervenors. National Wildlife Federation v. Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Petroleum Institute, Asarco Inc., Intervenors. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Petroleum Institute, American Mining Congress, Asarco, Inc., Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. State of Colorado v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. State of New York v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco, Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. People of the State of California, Ex Rel. John K. Van De Kamp, Attorney General of California v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. Chemical Manufacturers Association v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., National Wildlife Federation, Intervenors. Public Service Electric & Gas Company, and Dana Corporation v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., National Wildlife Federation, Intervenors. National Wildlife Federation v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior, State of New York v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. Newton v. Roche Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2002

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  3. In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. In re Heparin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API