Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1911No. 1390PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Oklahoma County Court; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by Charles W. Edwards against Ed. F. Miller to recover $500 and interest, alleged to be due on a promissory note. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This action was begun September 28, 1908, in the county court of Oklahoma county, by Charles W. Edwards, plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as plaintiff, against Ed. E. Miller, defendant in error, and herein after called defendant, to recover the sum of $500 with interest at 6 per cent, per annum from January 11, 1907, alleged to be due on a certain promissory note of that date, made payable to one Bruce Sims, and alleged to have been transferred in the ordinary course of business, before maturity, 'to the plaintiff in error. The defendant answered and admitted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Prescott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Clark v. O'TooleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. First Nat. Bank of Guymon v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Yukon Mills & Grain Co. v. Imperial Roller Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Lawless v. RaddisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Sands v. David Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. St. L. S. F. R. Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API