Legal Opinion

Westheimer v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 13, 1987No. 86 CIV. 9807 (PKL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEISURE, District Judge:

Plaintiffs in this action sought a preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65. After oral argument on January 8, 1987, and based in addition on the papers submitted by the parties, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion. The following constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).

Findings of Fact

Defendant Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“COMEX”) is a duly designated contract market, pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “CEA”), and serves as a large market for the trading of precious metals futures…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. First Jersey Securities, Inc. v. BergenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Thomas v. Musical Mutual Protective UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. National Association Of Securities Dealers, Inc., Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. United States v. KhanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Datek Securities Corp. v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. McLaughlin, Piven, Vogel, Inc. v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API