Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Middletown Hydraulic Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1926No. 19207PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This is an original action in quo warranto in this court, filed by the state of Ohio, on relation of the Attorney General.

The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Ohio.

The petition alleges the state ownership of the Middletown feeder as a part of the Miami and Erie Canal; further alleges that the defendant owns and operates a manufacturing plant located in the vicinity of the feeder, and that the defendant now is, and for a long time has been, diverting water from the feeder to its manufacturing plant for manufacturing purposes, without authority of law and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swendig v. Washington Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Madden v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Maumee Valley Electric Co. v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Conserv. Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Maumee Valley Electric Co. v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1928
  5. College Corner Local School District Board of Education v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API