Legal Opinion
Maumee Valley Electric Co. v. City of Toledo
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1926No. 4483PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal grows out of the following state of facts:
The Miami & Erie Canal, constructed by the state of Ohio (as part of its system of public navigable canals), and completed by the year 1845, extended from Cincinnati northerly to and through Defiance; thence northeasterly along the Maumee river, into and through the city of Toledo, to Lake Erie. The part of the canal involved in this case lies on the northerly side of the Maumee river, and extends a distance of about 18 miles northerly from Providence (just below tho state dam at Grand Rapids, Ohio) to lock 45, which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Silver King Coalition Mines Co. of Nevada v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Orr v. . Doubleday, Page Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Johns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laurent v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Kentucky Rock Asphalt Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Maumee Valley Electric Co. v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1928
- Ulmen v. National Surety Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.