Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1929No. 674PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This is a direct appeal under § 266 of the Judicial Code from a final, decree, following an interlocutory decree, of a district court of three judges for southern Ohio. The decree enjoined appellants, the Superintendent of Public Works of Ohio, a state officer, the City of Toledo, certain villages in Ohio, and the Board of County Commissioners of Lucas County, Ohio, from draining or otherwise interfering with the flow of water in a section of the Miami & Erie Canal in such manner as to interfere with rights of appellee to take surplus water from the canal under certain leases and a grant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fox v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Middletown Hydraulic Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Land, 62.50 Acres of Land More or Less, Situated in Jefferson Parish, State of Louisiana, Okc Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. In re the Schenectady Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API