Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Howard Blum

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1970No. 18-56209PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLUMMER, District Judge.

Appellant, Frank Howard Blum (Blum) was convicted in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, after trial by court on a stipulation of facts, of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) (d). A timely appeal was taken to this court which has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1291 and 1294(4).

The threshold question presented is whether probable cause existed at the time a police radio broadcast was initiated requesting Blum’s arrest for passing counterfeit bills.

The facts and circumstances known to the law enforcement officers at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Clara Bell HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Rodis v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Donald EverettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Rodis v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. PerryDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API