Legal Opinion
Rodis v. City and County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 2007No. 05-15522PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Rodel E. Rodis brought suit against the City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Police Department, the police chief, and two police officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights during a February 17, 2003 arrest. The district court dismissed the suit against the City and the police chief, but it rejected an assertion of qualified immunity by two of the officers (“Defendants”). Defendants brought an interlocutory appeal, and we affirm, finding the Defendants not entitled to qualified immunity.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beaver v. City of Federal WayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
- Brewton v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Rodis v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Albanese v. City of OrovilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Castillo v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.