Legal Opinion
Rodis v. City & County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 9, 2009No. 05-15522PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Rodel E. Rodis brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against, inter alia, two San Francisco police officers, alleging a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights during a February 2003 arrest. The district court rejected the assertion of qualified immunity by the police officers. Defendants filed an interlocutory appeal, and, in 2007, we affirmed. The Supreme Court granted Defendants’ petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated our decision, and remanded for further consideration, in light of Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009).…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Liberal v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Conner v. HeimanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hung Lam v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Armando Nieves Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Meas v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.