Legal Opinion

F. H. Paul & Stein Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 12, 1960No. C.D. 2166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

The above two cases were consolidated for trial. They relate to importations which are described on the consular invoices as “Etched Aluminum Capacitor Foil * * * gauge .0037".”'

The foil embraced within protest 326457-K was classified as aluminum foil of the kind made dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem in paragraph 382(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 382(a)), as modified by the Swiss Trade Agreement, 69 Treas. Dec. 74, T.D. 48093.

The similar foil to which protest 325763-K relates received the same classification by the collector but due to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Universal Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific Fast Mail, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Naftone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Lee Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API