Legal Opinion

Newman-Andrew Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 1, 1911No. 149; No. 152PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Cross-Appeals transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, G. A. 6925 (T. D. 29930).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

These are cross-appeals from a decision of -the Board of General Appraisers.

The merchandise consists of what was termed in the invoice "wortles” and “drawplates.”

The drawplates are from 13 to 18 inches long by-4-| to 5¿ inches wide and from 1| to If inches thick. The wortles are approximately 8 inches long by 11 inches wide and 1J inches thick. Both are forged from the ingot through various stages to their condition as imported. The so-called drawplate contains 18 holes, one end being hammered down to form a handle, and the wortles 6 holes, all of diminishing diameters, being from 1 to 11…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saltonstall v. WiebuschSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Universal Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Neuman & Schwiers Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. Herron Zimmers Moulding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API