Legal Opinion

Black v. Black

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1926No. Docket No. 3004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action in unlawful detainer. The plaintiff was, prior to and at the time of the commencement of this action, the owner of a certain tract of improved land in Sonoma County, which is described in the complaint by metes and bounds, and which has been and was, down to the time of the filing of the complaint herein, devoted to farming, horticultural, and viticultural uses and purposes. The complaint alleges that, on or about the first day of November, 1923, the plaintiff, by an oral lease made on said day, leased to the defendant the said land, together with certain farming tools and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. DuhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Johnson v. ForemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buck v. MorrossisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Camp v. MatichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Bear Valley Mutual Water Co. v. Prestige Point (In Re Prestige Point)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990
  5. 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API