Legal Opinion

Reed v. Carolina Holdings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 2017No. COA15-1034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

*783 A defendant may not argue on appeal that the North Carolina Industrial Commission lacks the authority to award fees for attorneys to be paid out of an award of medical compensation without preserving the issue before the Commission. An award of attendant care compensation will be upheld where the Commission's findings of fact are supported by competent evidence and the findings of fact support the Commission's conclusion of law that the attendant care services are reasonable and necessary.

Carolina Holdings, Wolseley Management, and ACE USA/ESIS ("Defendants") appeal from an…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Penegar v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Pine v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Gilliam v. Foothills Temp. Emp'tCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API