Legal Opinion

Penegar v. United Parcel Serv.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 2018No. COA17-404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

The North Carolina Industrial Commission (the "Commission") did not err in finding that an employee's last injurious exposure to asbestos, which contributed to his development of an occupational disease, occurred during the thirty years he worked for his primary lifetime employer, based on the testimony of his former co-workers and medical experts, and in the absence of any evidence that he was exposed to asbestos at any subsequent job. Nor did the Commission err in calculating the employee's average weekly wage based upon the employee's earnings in the year immediately preceding…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haulcy v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Hinson v. Cont'l Tire The Ams.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API