Pine v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
INMAN, Judge.
*322 This appeal involves a commonly relied upon presumption in North Carolina workers' compensation law, which shifts from an employee to an employer the burden of proof for causation of an injury. At issue is whether the North Carolina Industrial Commission erred by applying this presumption, known as the Parsons presumption, to a medical condition not listed on an employer's admission of compensability form.
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., employer, and National Union Fire Insurance Co., carrier, (collectively "Defendants") appeal from an Opinion and Award of the Full North Carolina…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Holley v. Acts, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pine v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Garrett v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018