Legal Opinion
Dufloth v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 17, 1992No. C4-92-685PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals from a trial court order rescinding revocation of respondent Raymond Du-floth’s driving privileges. The trial court held that the implied consent advisory improperly failed to inform respondent of the right to consult an attorney after he was tested for alcohol concentration. We reverse.
FACTS
On December 14, 1991, a. police officer arrested Raymond Dufloth under Minn. Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) (Supp.1991), for driving under the influence of alcohol. The officer read Dufloth an advisory informing him of his right to consult an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Przymus v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KarauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Lindberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Cosky v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Cosky v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Dufloth v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992