Legal Opinion
Sigurdson v. Isanti County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1987No. C2-86-2071PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONE, Judge.
This gender discrimination case is before us for the second time. The action originated when appellant Renja Sigurdson sued respondents Isanti County, Aaron Boettcher and Frank ‘Mennenga, alleging sex discrimination in employment practices under the Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. l(2)(c) (1982). The trial court rejected an advisory jury’s finding of sex discrimination, denied appellant recovery on any of her claims and ordered her to pay Isanti County attorney’s fees. This court affirmed the trial court’s finding that appellant was not discriminated against…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Brantley Ex Rel. Brantley v. Independent School District No. 625District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- State v. HandySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Greiner v. City of ChamplinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Eurpac Service Inc. v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.