Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Pendleton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 9, 1897PublishedCited by 35 opinions

On Exceptions by Dependants. Tliis was au action on tbe case for wrongfully causing tlie plaintiff to be discharged while an employee of tbe Mount Waldo Granite Company. Tbe defendants took exceptions to overruling a demurrer to tlie declaration. Declaration.

Read the full summary

On Exceptions by Dependants. Tliis was au action on tbe case for wrongfully causing tlie plaintiff to be discharged while an employee of tbe Mount Waldo Granite Company. Tbe defendants took exceptions to overruling a demurrer to tlie declaration. Declaration. In a plea of tlie case, for that the plaintiff on tbe last day of May, A. D. 1895, and for twenty-two years prior to that time, bad been at work for and employed by the Mount Waldo Granite Company, a corporation duly existing according to law and having an established place of business at said Frankfort, in tbe business of cutting stone…

1Opinion of the CourtWiswell, J.

To the plaintiff’s declaration, which appears in full in the statement of the case, the defendants filed a general demurrer, which was overruled by the justice presiding at nisi prius, and the declaration adjudged good. The case comes to the law court upon exceptions to this ruling.

The plaintiff alleges that upon a certain day he was, and for twenty-two years prior to that time had been, in the employ of the Mount Waldo Granite Company as a stone cutter, working by the piece; that he was making large profits out of his employment; that he would have continued in such employment from the day…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Benton v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. Lucke v. Clothing Cutters & Trimmers' Assembly No. 7507Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. HornIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API