Legal Opinion

Lucke v. Clothing Cutters & Trimmers' Assembly No. 7507

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 1893PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Appeal from tlie Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an action brought by the appellant to recover damages for the wrongful and malicious interference of the appellee, by which he was discharged from his em*398ployment in the New York Clothing House, and prevented the free exercise of his trade and occupation, and thereby deprived of his means of livelihood. It appears from the testimony produced on the part of the appellant in the Court below, that the trade of the appellant was that of a customs cutter,” that is one who took the measure of customers desiring to have clothing made to order, cut the material according to measurement, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chipley v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. Benton v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API