Legal Opinion

United States Postal Service v. David Notestine

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1988No. 88-2480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

The United States Postal Service, acting under express statutory authority, resorted to district court to obtain a preliminary injunction permitting it to retain the mail of named persons while it conducted an administrative proceeding to investigate charges that those persons had solicited money through the mail by means of false representation. The district court not only denied the injunction but issued a preliminary injunction forbidding the Service to pursue the administrative proceeding. It further ordered that the charges of false representation be decided…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Environmental Defense Fund v. William K. Reilly, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. Top Choice Distributors, Inc. And Salvatore Sciandra v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. RichmondDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API