White v. Ratliff
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered February £4, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Per curiam
Respondent, who was plaintiff below, brought this action to recover for services performed under an oral contract. His term of service ran over a period of five months, and, as he alleges and the jury found, he was to receive the sum of $300 per month. Appellants denied the employment of respondent, and alleged affirmatively that, if the respondent performed any service, it was for the New Crystal Mining Company of which appellant L. L. Ratliff was manager. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the respondent.
Error is assigned as follows: In instructions given and refused; insufficiency of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Coffey v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Gerber v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Davies v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. MacleodWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- McLean v. BurgingerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.