Legal Opinion

Davies v. Carey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1913No. 10784PublishedCited by 13 opinions

' Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered June 14, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, a storekeeper at Port Orchard, in Kitsap county, seeks to recover from defendants the value of merchandise delivered by him to Harris Brothers, who were at the time engaged in logging operations in that county under a contract with the defendant William Carey. The plaintiff rests his right to recover from the defendants upon the promise of the defendant William Carey to pay for the merchandise so delivered. A trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount claimed, from which the defendants have appealed.

In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Howell v. HarveyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Burns v. Bradford-Kennedy Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Goldie-Klenert Distributing Co. v. BothwellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. McKenzie v. Puget Sound National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gaines v. DurhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Washington Printing Co. v. OsnerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dybdahl v. Continental Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Lovell v. HayeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Campbell v. Weston Basket & Barrel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API