Legal Opinion
Whittlesey v. Union Carbide Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1983No. 82 Civ. 4401(PNL)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., was amended in 1978 to raise the age of permissible compulsory retirement from 65 to 70. P.L. 95-256, 92 Stat. 189. The amendment carried an exemption permitting the compulsory retirement at 65 of employees who were entitled to a specified level of retirement benefits and who for two years prior to retirement were “employed in a bona fide executive or a high policy making position .... ” Section 12(c)(1), 29 U.S.C. § 631(c)(1).
This case is among the first to test the scope of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dickerson v. Deluxe Check Printers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Koyen v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Hoffman v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1981
3Cited by21 opinions
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Moses Passer v. American Chemical SocietyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Whittlesey v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Barbara B. Butler v. New York State Department of Law, Dennis C. Vacco and William FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.