Legal Opinion

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1984No. 82-2444, 83-1073PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought this action against Prudential Federal Savings and Loan (Prudential) alleging that Prudential violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA or the Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1982), when it discharged six employees and demoted a seventh. The case was tried to a jury, which found that one employee, Douglas Tanner, had been illegally terminated because of his age and awarded him $34,200 in past lost wages and benefits.1 The jury found that the violation had not been willful and accordingly did not…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gary McKnight Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API