Legal Opinion

Windward Partners, a Registered Hawaii Partnership v. George Ariyoshi, Governor of the State of Hawaii

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1982No. 80-4509PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Windward Partners seeks damages arising out of the purchase by the state of Hawaii, under threat of condemnation, of property on which plaintiffs held an option to purchase. The state’s purchase was expressly made subject to the option. Defendants are the owner of the purchased property, her attorney, and various state officials.

Windward’s complaint alleges five causes of action. Three of these causes are based in contract and are directed to property owner Marks and attorney Kay. Both compensatory and punitive damages are sought under these claims. Another cause of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Littman v. GimelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
  3. North East Medical Services, Inc. v. California Department of Health Care Services, Health & Human Services AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. McNally v. University of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API