McNally v. University of Hawaii
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO CONTINUE; ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT; ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Before the court are Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The court grants the motions on the ground that McNally fails to raise genuine issues of fact that would preclude judgment as a matter of law.
Plaintiff Kathleen McNally alleges that she was not retained as the Athletic Director of Defendant University of Hawaii at Hilo (“UHH”) on the Big Island of Hawaii because she had complained about violations of Title IX. McNally…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Daniels v. DonahoeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Turner v. Department of EducationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Pauline v. STATE OF HAWAII DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Conviser v. DePaul UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Davidson v. University of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.