Legal Opinion

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 10, 1985No. CV-R-84-257-ECRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge.

Lake Tahoe, a unique high Sierra mountain lake and the dominant natural feature of the Tahoe basin, is losing its most valued quality, its pristine clarity. In recognition of this deterioration, the states of Nevada and California and the United States Congress ratified the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact (hereinafter Compact). The Compact is designed to protect, preserve, and enhance the Lake Tahoe Basin. See Tahoe Regional Planning Compact, Pub.L. 91-148, 83 Stat. 360, amended 1980 Pub.L. 96-551, 94 Stat. 3233, NRS 277.200, West’s Ann.Cal.Gov.Code, §…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Stephans v. State of Nev.District Court, D. Nevada · 1988
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API